By now most in the industry know about the fire incident on board X-Press Pearl at Colombo anchorage.
Let us chronicle the event, deliberate the cause, and find a way forward for safer shipping.

Timeline

  • May 10th Departed Jebel Ali, UAE
  • May 11th Departed Hamad, Qatar
  • May 15th Departed Hazira, India
  • May 19th Arrived Colombo anchorage
  • Master of the vessel had requested Hamad and Hazira port about leaking container and need to discharge same. The request was declined by both ports stating no specialist facilities available.
  • May 20th Vessel reported fire in a no. 2 cargo hold to Colombo Port Authority, fire was put off by vessel staff. Leaking nitric acid container was loaded on deck.
  • May 21st Due to reignition of fire Sri Lankan port authority and navy pressed into firefighting. Fire brought under control and cooling operation continued to prevent reignition.
  • May 25th An explosion took place in the cargo hold.
  • May 29th Vessel operator released statement that the firefighting has reduced the fire aboard and now only there is fire at the aft of the vessel.
  • 2nd June Vessel operator reported vessels aft is touching the seabed.
  • 4th June Vessel’s forward part is sinking slowly.

All crew were evacuated by Sri Lankan Navy.

Read Home | X-Press Pearl – Incident Information Centre (x-presspearl-informationcentre.com)

Cause

Was the fire started due to leaking nitric acid? Or any reactive or self heating goods below deck? Or any misdeclared or undeclared goods?

As of now I believe no one knows the exact cause of fire. As the vessel had reported leaking container with nitric acid many concluded this leaking nitric acid may have reacted with other goods starting fire. For packing group I & II EmS Spillage schedule (S-Q) for nitric acid (on deck) advice the Master to “Wash overboard with copious quantities of water. Keep clear of effluent”. Read What is EmS and how this is used? “Copious quantities of water” means total quantities of water provided for optimal fire-fighting using four jets of water, as required by SOLAS regulation II-2/4.

People are speculating that this (acid leak) led to the fire. Actually this (leaking container) was on deck. The fire started in the Number 02 hold.”

Capt. Nirmal de Silva, Harbour Master, Colombo (Source Economynext).

May be the investigators after analyzing all cargo data, stowage plans and debriefing the Master and the crew about the events will be able to zero in on the origin of fire.

Was this caused by misdeclared dangerous goods? We do not know, however, misdeclaration of dangerous goods is a real concern of the industry and various incidents had occurred in the past due to same. What prompts the shippers to misdeclare or undeclare dangerous goods? Is it to avoid hazardous surcharges or to pass through ports which has restriction for the goods? Read result of dangerous goods misdeclaration survey.

Way forward

Looking back into history we can see that after the sinking of RMS Titanic in 1912 the then world’s developed nations brought forth the SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea) Convention in 1914.

In 1948 SOLAS Chapter VI came out first time with requirements for safe carriage of Grain and Dangerous Goods. Further SOLAS 1960 brought out Chapter VII dedicated for Carriage of Dangerous Goods. (read Origin and Evolution of IMDG Code )

2004 IMDG Code became mandatory for carriage of dangerous goods and marine pollutants in packaged form.

2010 IMDG Code made mandatory training for shoreside personnel. Read Ship fires often start ashore – exploring the causes of container ship fires (ttclub.com)

There were numerous fires aboard container ships in the last decade. Whenever a major fire breaks out the news remains alive for a short period and then all forget about it.

Are we all strictly following the IMDG Code in letter and spirit? 

After the fire on board Maersk Honam in 2018 NCB (National Cargo Bureau) upon request from Maersk Line engaged in inspection of containers to find any non-compliances. The NCB’s inspection found that out of 500 containers inspected 274 containers had improper securing, 109 & 40 dangerous goods import and export containers failed in marks/labels/placards, cargo securing and documentation. More than 50% non-dangerous goods containers failed in cargo securing.  (Read NCB White Paper on Container Inspection Initiative).

With these findings and considering the complicated vast network of the industry and thousands of personnel engaged in various capacities and responsibilities NCB published a white paper A comprehensive holistic approach to enhance safety and address the carriage of undeclared, misdeclared and other non-compliant dangerous goods.

Holistic Characterized by comprehension of the parts of something as intimately interconnected and explicable only by reference to the whole.

The white paper puts forth below recommendations

  • Establish a corporate culture for DG compliance
  • Establish a Dangerous Goods department
  • Establish a compliant DG training program
  • Establish disciplined “cut-off” times
  • Incorporate integrated digital tools
  • Establish a DG documentation process
  • Establish a DG planning process
  • Adopt a risk-based strategy for stowage of dangerous goods
  • Establish a receiving in-gate process for DG cargo
  • Establish a DG container inspection program
  • Establish a vessel inspection process for DG cargo
  • Create one common, centralized DG data base

The levels of non-compliance observed indicate a system ripe for the type of disasters the industry has experienced over the last several years. This will continue unless a comprehensive holistic approach is adopted by the industry to attack the root of the problem and minimize non-compliance by all supply chain participants.

(Source NCB White Paper).

Download NCB White Paper A comprehensive holistic approach to enhance safety and address the carriage of undeclared, misdeclared and other non-compliant dangerous goods

By shashi kallada

25 years in Merchant Shipping, Last 13 years working on Packaged Dangerous Goods Sailor, Ex Manager Global Dangerous Goods Maersk Line * Freelance Photographer *Amateur Cyclist

2 thoughts on “X-Press Pearl fire -The need of holistic approach to enhance safety”
  1. Does anybody know whether the nitric acid was carried in a dry container or an Isotank?

Write your view

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.