man standing in container with bottles

Our last article covered ISPM 15, the treatment and marking of wood packaging inside a container. This one covers the container itself when it has been fumigated for its sea voyage. The rules depend on one question asked at the load port: was the unit ventilated before it came aboard?

1. What UN 3359 covers

A fumigated cargo transport unit is a closed CTU (container) holding goods or materials that have been fumigated within the unit itself. This is a different regulatory event from ISPM 15: it does not matter whether the cargo, the dunnage, or the packaging is wood at all. Any closed unit carrying a fumigant gas (applied to control pests in grain, timber, machinery packing, textiles, or anything else) falls under IMDG 5.5.2 once that gas is present.

The pests being targeted generally fall into two broad groups: stored-product pests (weevils, beetles, moths and similar insects that infest grain, pulses, dried foodstuffs and similar bulk commodities) and wood and packaging pests (wood-boring beetles and similar insects that infest pallets, dunnage, and timber cargo itself — the same pest category ISPM 15 is built around, here found in the cargo rather than the packaging). Fumigation is chosen over surface treatments because a gas can penetrate into grain kernels, timber, cracks and voids that a spray or dust never reaches, and because it is applied to kill pests at every life stage present (eggs, larvae, pupae and adults), not just the visible adult insects. Eggs and pupae are typically the most resistant life stages to a given fumigant, so the concentration and exposure time in a fumigation schedule has to be enough to kill the hardest stage to eliminate, not just the easiest.

Scope:

  • A fumigated CTU containing no other dangerous goods is not subject to any part of the IMDG Code other than Chapter 5.5, section 5.5.2 itself. That section in turn applies the Dangerous Goods List (Chapter 3.2) and 5.4.3 (documentation required aboard the ship) to all fumigated CTUs, UN 3359 (5.5.2.1.4).
  • If the unit also contains dangerous goods in addition to the fumigant, all the normal provisions for those goods (placarding, marking, documentation, segregation) apply on top of the 5.5.2 provisions, not instead of them.
  • Only CTUs that can be closed so that gas escape is minimised may be used to transport cargo under fumigation.
  • Persons engaged in the handling of fumigated CTUs must be trained commensurate with their responsibilities (5.5.2.2).
  • Fumigants must never be applied to the contents of a CTU once it is already loaded aboard the ship. Fumigation happens shoreside, before loading, not as an in-transit treatment initiated at sea.
Closed shipping container

A closed cargo transport unit — once fumigated, it falls under IMDG 5.5.2 regardless of what the cargo inside actually is. Photo via Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

2. Ventilated and non-ventilated units

Marking, documentation and stowage all follow from one shoreside question: was the unit completely ventilated (by opening its doors or by mechanical ventilation) before it was loaded aboard the ship?

✓ Ventilated before loading

The unit has been opened up (or mechanically ventilated) and the fumigant gas allowed to escape completely, without unloading the cargo.

  • The fumigation warning mark stays on the unit, but the date of ventilation is added to it.
  • No transport document is required for UN 3359 purposes — the marked ventilation date substitutes for it (5.5.2.4.4).
  • That relief covers the document only. Under 5.5.2.1.4 the Dangerous Goods List entry for UN 3359 (stowage category B, SW2) and the 5.4.3 special list, manifest or stowage plan still apply to all fumigated CTUs. The extra shipboard precautions described in Section 5 are directed at units still under fumigation.
  • The mark itself is only removed once the unit has both been ventilated and the fumigated goods have been unloaded.

✗ Not ventilated before loading (“fumigation in transit”)

The unit still has an active fumigant atmosphere inside it when it comes aboard.

  • Full UN 3359 treatment applies: proper shipping name, class 9, warning mark without a ventilation date.
  • A transport document is mandatory, carrying the fumigant type, quantity, and date/time of application.
  • The unit is entered on the special list/manifest/stowage plan with its stowage location.
  • Ship-side precautions apply — stowage location, gas-detection equipment, trained crew, master notification (see Section 5).
This decision sets the paperwork and the shipboard precautions. Treating a properly ventilated unit as if it needs a full UN 3359 transport document is over-compliance that confuses terminals and consignees. Treating a non-ventilated unit as “just a marked container” because the paperwork was skipped is a hazard: the master and crew have no way of knowing an active gas atmosphere is aboard.

Time between application and loading: 24 hours is normally sufficient to reach a reasonably uniform gas concentration throughout the cargo, but the actual period is set by the competent authority and varies with fumigant type, quantity, commodity, and temperature. “24 hours” is a rule of thumb, not a fixed rule.

3. The fumigation warning mark

A fumigated CTU must carry the warning mark at each access point, positioned where anyone opening or entering the unit will see it easily. The mark specification:

  • A rectangle, minimum 400 mm wide × 300 mm high, with an outer line at least 2 mm wide
  • Black print on a white background, lettering not less than 25 mm high

The durability requirement is in the same paragraph, 5.5.2.3.2: the method of marking must be such that the information remains identifiable on cargo transport units surviving at least three months’ immersion in the sea.

The mark stays on the unit until two conditions are both satisfied: the unit has been ventilated to remove harmful fumigant concentrations, and the fumigated goods have been unloaded.

Class 9 placards (Model No. 9) must not be affixed to a fumigated CTU on account of the fumigant itself — only if the unit separately contains other Class 9 goods or articles that independently require it. Fumigation alone does not trigger a Class 9 placard.

4. Documentation for non-ventilated units

For units that have not been completely ventilated before transport, the accompanying documents must state:

  1. “UN 3359, fumigated cargo transport unit, 9” (or “…class 9”)
  2. The date and time of fumigation
  3. The type and amount of the fumigant used

The document can take any form, provided the information is easy to identify, legible and durable. IMDG 5.5.2.4.3 adds one further requirement. Its text is: “Instructions for disposal of any residual fumigant including fumigation devices (if used) shall be provided.” It does not say who carries out the disposal, only that instructions for doing so must be provided.

A transport document is not required once a unit has been completely ventilated and the ventilation date marked per Section 3 above (5.5.2.4.4) — the mark itself carries the information in that case. That paragraph relieves the document; it does not say that no residue or device remains. Ventilation does not by itself establish that all reactants, devices or residues have been removed, so assess them before the unit is opened or unloaded.

5. Shipboard handling of units in transit under fumigation

Shipping containers stored in a yard awaiting loading

Containers awaiting loading — the ventilated/non-ventilated decision has to be made and acted on before this point, not after. Photo via Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

MSC.1/Circ.1361/Rev.1 (2022) adds operational detail that IMDG 5.5.2 itself does not spell out. For a non-ventilated unit coming aboard:

  • Pre-loading check — the unit should be checked for leaks before loading, and any leakage sealed. The master must be informed prior to loading (5.5.2.5.3).
  • Stowage — UN 3359 carries stowage category B (on or under deck permitted) with stowage code SW2 assigned in column 16a of the Dangerous Goods List. SW2 is defined in IMDG Chapter 7.1 as “clear of living quarters,” which means the unit must be stowed a minimum distance of 3 m from accommodation, air intakes, machinery spaces and other enclosed work areas. On-deck stowage is preferred for non-ventilated units.
  • If stowed under deck — the cargo space must have mechanical ventilation sufficient to keep fumigant concentration below the threshold limit for occupational exposure (found on the fumigant’s Safety Data Sheet), at a ventilation rate of at least two air changes per hour based on the empty cargo space. The ship must also carry gas-detection equipment suitable for the specific fumigant, with instructions for its use.
  • If stowed on deck — the ship should still carry appropriate gas-detection equipment for the fumigant concerned.
  • Trained representatives — at least one officer and one other crew member must receive appropriate training and be designated as the master’s trained representatives, responsible for safe conditions in occupied spaces and for briefing the crew before the fumigated unit is loaded.
  • Onboard resources — the ship should carry at least four sets of appropriate respiratory protective equipment, the relevant Safety Data Sheet or fumigant manufacturer’s guidance, and emergency response information such as the current Medical First Aid Guide (MFAG).
  • Arrival notification — the master should notify the destination country’s and any port-of-call’s appropriate authorities, generally at least 24 hours before arrival, that fumigation in transit is being carried out, stating the fumigant type, fumigation date, and which cargo spaces are involved.

These recommendations apply to the “not ventilated” branch in Section 2. For a unit ventilated before loading, the document relief in 5.5.2.4.4 applies, but 5.5.2.1.4 still applies the Dangerous Goods List entry and 5.4.3 to the unit.

6. The fumigants

Phosphine and methyl bromide are the two most often seen on grain, timber and general dry-cargo shipments. Chloropicrin, sulfuryl fluoride, hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, and several soil/pre-plant fumigants (1,3-dichloropropene, dazomet, methyl isocyanate, iodoform) are also used in the fumigation industry. MSC.1/Circ.1361/Rev.1 gives specific operational detail for phosphine and methyl bromide (and increasingly sulfuryl fluoride) in CTU fumigation at sea.

FumigantHow it’s appliedDetection profile
Phosphine (from magnesium or aluminium phosphide)Sachets, tablets or pressed plates that react with airborne moisture to release phosphine gas — works over a longer exposure period; the product must be used under its label and the applicable authorisationSlight “fishy garlic” odour; breaks down to a powdery grey residue (magnesium/aluminium hydroxide). Visual signs — sachets, tablets, residue — are often present inside the unit, though fumigant can migrate between cargo items and not be immediately visible. Moisture re-entering an opened unit can restart the reaction. Odour is not a reliable clearance method.
Methyl bromideSupplied and applied as a gas — a relatively rapid process, normally complete in under 48 hours, but requires expertise to apply correctlyNo reliable visual or odour signs — the harder of the two to detect. A unit fumigated with methyl bromide must be treated with gas-detection equipment and never assumed safe by sight or smell.
Sulfuryl fluorideApplied as a compressed gas; increasingly used as a methyl bromide alternativeColourless and odourless on its own, so it gives no sensory warning. Whether a warning agent such as chloropicrin has been added depends on the product and the authorised application, so do not assume one is present. Heavier than air, so it pools in low, enclosed spaces.
ChloropicrinApplied on its own as a soil/commodity fumigant, or in some products added in small proportion as a warning agentA powerful tear gas with an intensely irritating odour. Where it is present the irritation is the detection mechanism, but its presence in a given unit cannot be assumed.
Hydrogen cyanideGenerated from cyanide salts, or applied directly as gasClassically described as having a faint bitter-almond odour, but a substantial proportion of people are genetically unable to smell it at all — odour cannot be relied on as a warning sign.
FormaldehydeApplied as a gas or generated from paraformaldehydePungent, sharply irritating odour to eyes and respiratory tract even at low concentration — rarely used today as a commodity fumigant compared with its historical use.
1,3-Dichloropropene, dazomet, methyl isocyanate, iodoformPrimarily soil, nematode and pre-plant fumigants rather than commodity/container fumigantsEncountered far less often in sea container fumigation than in agricultural soil treatment. They are listed because they appear in the same IMO fumigant list.
Not every fumigated CTU arrives declared or marked as such, despite the requirement. Practical indicators of an undeclared fumigation include taped-over door seals or vents, packets or piles of powdery residue inside, a faint garlic-like odour, and the nature/origin/destination of the cargo (grain, timber, dried foodstuffs and similar commodities are the recurring pattern). None of these substitute for a gas test before entry.

7. Detecting an undeclared or residual fumigant atmosphere

Before anyone opens or enters a fumigated (or supposedly ventilated) CTU, a risk assessment and gas test should be carried out. Three detection approaches are in common use, each with limitations:

  • Glass stain-tube equipment — simple, robust, and can be operated from outside the unit using a lance through the doorway; air is drawn through a reagent-impregnated tube that changes colour on contact with the target gas. Tubes must be used within their expiry date and warmed above 0°C in sub-zero conditions.
  • Electronic (photo-ionization) gas testing equipment — measures the target gas via UV-light ionization and is useful for preliminary screening, but a PID sensor cannot measure oxygen level on its own — that requires a separate electrochemical or galvanic oxygen sensor, often bundled into the same handheld multi-gas meter but functionally distinct from the PID cell. PID readings are also prone to false positives from cross-sensitivity to unrelated volatile substances, and are not accurate enough on their own for determining safe exposure levels.
  • Personal monitors — useful as an ongoing audible warning device during unloading, but not suitable as the initial detection method; whether a suitable monitor exists depends on the gas concerned (they are commonly used for phosphine), so confirm this for the fumigant involved. An oxygen-level reading alone doesn’t confirm the atmosphere is fumigant-free.

For unloading: ventilate for as long as practicable before entry, unload front-to-back rather than “tunnelling” into the cargo to retrieve specific packages, and remember that gas can desorb from bagged cereals or cartons with large air spaces over many days. A unit declared ventilated some time ago can still present a risk on reopening.

8. Common errors

Attaching a transport document to a ventilated unit. Once a unit is completely ventilated and the date is marked, no separate transport document is required. Producing one anyway is not wrong, but treating one as mandatory for every fumigated unit regardless of ventilation status misreads 5.5.2.4.4.
Affixing a Class 9 placard because the unit was fumigated. Fumigation itself never triggers a Class 9 placard — only Class 9 goods packed inside the unit do.
Attempting fumigation after the unit is already aboard. This is prohibited — no person should be permitted by the master to fumigate a CTU’s contents once loaded on board.
Treating “no smell, no sign” as “safe” for methyl bromide. Unlike phosphine, methyl bromide gives no reliable visual or olfactory warning. Gas-detection equipment, not the senses, is the only dependable check.
Assuming a 24-hour pre-loading wait is a fixed rule. It is a normally sufficient guideline, not a mandated figure — the competent authority sets the actual period based on fumigant, quantity, commodity and temperature.
Overlooking undeclared fumigated units. Not every unit that should carry the warning mark does. Absence of a mark is not absence of fumigant; the indicators in Section 6 and a gas test before entry still apply.

References

For the wood packaging inside the container, see ISPM 15 Explained.


Discover more from IMDG Code Compliance Centre

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

By Shashi Kallada

35 years in Merchant Shipping, Last 23 years working on IMDG Code. Ex Sailor, Ex Manager Global Dangerous Goods Maersk Line.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from IMDG Code Compliance Centre

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading